Automating Patch Management: Free Tools vs. Managed IT

Software updates and security patches might seem like a mundane IT chore, but neglecting them can be catastrophic. In one recent analysis, the average time to fix critical software vulnerabilities was 65 days[1] – that’s over two months that hackers can exploit a known weakness. It’s no surprise that about 60% of data breaches are linked to unpatched vulnerabilities[2]. Whether you run a small business in Chillicothe or Kansas City, or manage a medical clinic in Kirksville, timely patch management is vital to protect your operations from cyber threats and downtime.

The challenge is that keeping every server, PC, and application up to date is time-consuming and prone to human error. Many organizations fall behind; studies show companies often delay installing patches for months[3], and each missed update is a potential entry point for attackers. Manual patching – updating each device by hand – can overwhelm small IT teams (or businesses with no dedicated IT staff at all). This is where automating patch management comes into play. By automating patches, you ensure critical fixes are applied promptly with minimal effort.

 considerations by industry too.)

In this article, we’ll compare two primary approaches to automated patch management: using free do-it-yourself tools versus hiring a managed patch management service. We’ll break down the pros, cons, costs, and considerations of each option – including impacts on security, compliance, and IT workload. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which route makes sense for your organization to keep systems secure and up-to-date.

The Importance of Patching and Automation

Patching is essentially fixing the holes in your software. When vendors release updates, they often include fixes for security vulnerabilities that hackers could otherwise exploit. In the wild, cybercriminals actively search for unpatched systems—it’s often the easiest way in. In fact, Verizon’s latest breach report showed that about 1 in 5 breaches begin with attackers exploiting a known vulnerability[4]. Attacks targeting unpatched software surged by over 50% last year[5], a clear sign that if you ignore patches, your risk of a breach climbs significantly. Shockingly, even well-publicized vulnerabilities like Log4j and Microsoft’s ProxyShell continued to be actively exploited more than a year after patches were available[6] – a stark reminder that many teams struggle to keep up without an automated strategy.

Beyond security, patches also improve stability and support compliance. Many updates resolve bugs that cause crashes or poor performance, so regular patching means fewer tech glitches day-to-day. And for regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), keeping systems updated is often a compliance requirement. Running an outdated, unpatched system could even violate laws or cyber insurance policies, potentially leading to fines or liability if an incident occurs. Proper patch management provides an essential layer of defense for your customers’ data and your organization’s reputation[7].

Why automate patch management? Simply put, the volume and frequency of patches are too much to handle manually for most businesses. Microsoft, Adobe, Apple, and others issue updates constantly. If you have 20, 50, or 500 devices, applying each patch by hand is a never-ending task. It’s also error-prone: missing just one critical update on one PC can be enough for an attacker to slip in. As one expert noted, manually managing patches across all your systems is “extremely time-consuming” and pulls IT staff away from core business work[8]. Human error in manual patching can lead to updates being skipped or applied incorrectly – leaving vulnerabilities exposed[8]. Automation tackles these issues head-on. Automated patch management tools can scan for needed updates, push patches to all machines from a central console, and even reboot systems during off-hours to finish installation. In other words, automation ensures patches get applied consistently and on time, with far less labor.

Even with automation, someone still needs to oversee the process – deciding which patches to approve, handling any issues, and verifying everything is up to date. This is where the choice between DIY free tools versus a managed service becomes crucial. Do you want to run the patching process yourself (with the help of free software), or hand it off to a service provider to manage for you? Let’s look at what each entails.

Using Free Patch Management Tools (DIY Approach)

There are many free or open-source tools available to help automate patching. For businesses on a tight budget or those who love to tinker, these DIY solutions can be appealing. For example, Microsoft WSUS (Windows Server Update Services) is included with Windows Server and allows a business to centrally manage Windows updates at no extra software cost. Tools like Local Update Publisher (an open-source add-on for WSUS) even let you deploy third-party application patches through the familiar WSUS interface[9]. Popular third-party utilities like PDQ Deploy offer a free version with basic patching features, suitable for smaller environments[10]. And in the Linux world, administrators often script updates with tools like Ansible or shell scripts, which are free to use but require more expertise[11].

The advantages of free patch tools come down to cost and control. You don’t pay licensing fees, and you keep everything in-house. If you have a savvy IT administrator, they can customize and tweak open-source tools to fit your needs. For example, you could write scripts to automate updates on your schedule, or modify an open-source program’s code since it’s available for anyone to inspect. Many free tools have active user communities online – forums and how-tos – which can be helpful resources.

However, free doesn’t mean “no effort” – and that’s the trade-off. DIY patch management requires internal expertise and time. You (or your IT team) are responsible for setting up the system, monitoring for new patches, testing them, and troubleshooting any issues that arise. This can become a part-time job in itself. Open-source tools also come with no guaranteed support: if something breaks or you encounter a bug, you’re relying on community forums and documentation for help, rather than a vendor support line[12]. Integration can be tricky too; you might need to do additional scripting or configuration to get a free tool working smoothly with all your systems[13].

Let’s illustrate with the earlier examples: WSUS can download and push Microsoft updates for free, but it requires a Windows Server setup and knowledge of Group Policy for configuration. It also only covers Microsoft products. If you need to update, say, Chrome or Zoom, you’ll have to script that or use another tool. Local Update Publisher, while free and useful, “requires knowledge of WSUS to set up and maintain” and lacks advanced features like extensive reporting and automation[14]. In other words, it works, but it’s fairly basic and Windows-only[14]. PDQ Deploy’s free edition can automate many third-party app updates (it even has a library of 200+ pre-packaged apps), but the free tier lacks some scheduling and reporting capabilities that the paid version offers[15][16]. And if you try an open-source automation tool like Ansible for patching, you’ll gain flexibility, but you’ll also face a steep learning curve writing YAML playbooks and scripts to handle all your update tasks[17][18].

In summary, free patch management tools are best suited for organizations with strong IT know-how and relatively small scale. If you’re a tech-savvy startup or a hobbyist admin managing a handful of servers, DIY patching can save money and give you full control. You’ll need to dedicate time to continually manage the process, but it can work. On the other hand, if you lack an in-house IT person or if your team is already stretched thin, the “free” route can quickly turn into a burden. Remember that the real cost of DIY patching is your staff’s time and the security risk if something slips through the cracks. If you go this route, be prepared to invest the necessary hours to do it right. As the saying goes, it’s like doing your own car maintenance – you’ll save on fees, but you must be willing and able to get under the hood regularly!

Managed Patch Management Services (Outsourcing to an MSP)

A managed patch management service means outsourcing the whole update process to a third-party provider, typically as part of a Managed IT Services agreement. Instead of your team handling patches, an experienced Managed Service Provider (MSP) takes over this duty, using enterprise-grade tools and processes to keep your systems updated. Essentially, you’re hiring specialists to ensure your computers stay current and secure.

What are the benefits? For starters, this approach offloads a huge chunk of work from your plate. The MSP’s team will monitor for new patches, test them as needed, deploy them across all your devices, and verify installation – all in the background. This yields an immediate time and labor savings for you. Your staff can focus on strategic projects or daily operations, while patching happens “automatically” via the service. One industry analysis noted that Patch-Management-as-a-Service is “relatively inexpensive” considering what you get – the monthly fee covers all patching tasks, provides the latest patching technology, and frees up your overburdened IT staff to focus on other critical tasks[19].

Managed services also bring expertise and oversight that most small organizations simply don’t have in-house. Instead of hoping Jim in accounting remembers to manually update QuickBooks on his PC, you have dedicated IT professionals ensuring every system – servers, PCs, laptops, even network devices in some cases – is up to date. These professionals do patch management day in and day out, so they know best practices and common pitfalls. They can prioritize critical security patches (often deploying them within hours or days of release) and schedule less urgent updates during off-hours to minimize disruption[20]. Many providers use advanced patch management platforms that handle not just operating systems but also third-party software (browsers, Adobe, Java, etc.), giving you comprehensive coverage. For example, a modern MSP might patch Windows, macOS, and Linux machines and dozens of popular applications as part of their service, something very hard to replicate with free tools alone[21].

From a security standpoint, an MSP can greatly enhance your posture. They won’t “forget” to patch that one server in the closet – it’s their job to inventory and manage all your assets. A good provider will even catch legacy or end-of-life systems lurking in your environment. (It’s not uncommon for an MSP to discover a client still has a Windows 7 or an old Windows Server that hadn’t been patched in years; the MSP will flag this and help remediate it.) In fact, an effective patch management service will identify obsolete systems/software and either patch or replace them to eliminate those risk points[22]. It’s a proactive approach: rather than waiting for a breach to happen, the service is continuously closing windows of opportunity that attackers might exploit[23].

Let’s not forget compliance and reporting. A managed service typically provides regular reports showing the patch status of all your systems. If you need to meet standards like HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST, or just internal cybersecurity policies, these reports are a lifesaver. They prove that your machines are being kept up to date (often a checklist item in audits) and can pinpoint any device that fell out of line. Some services even include compliance-specific features, like mapping patch status to CIS benchmarks or other frameworks. Instead of you manually tracking dozens of updates, you can easily demonstrate patch compliance to auditors or executives with a monthly summary from your provider[24][25].

Are there downsides? The main consideration is cost and trust. Managed patch services aren’t free – you’ll pay a recurring fee for the convenience and expertise. For many small businesses, though, this is a predictable operating cost, often far less than the expense of a breach or the salary of a full-time IT employee. (In fact, using an MSP can be like having an entire IT team at a fraction of the cost of one in-house hire.) And when it comes to trust, you do need to choose your provider carefully. You’ll be giving them access to your systems, so you want a reputable company with a track record. It’s wise to discuss scheduling (e.g. if you have servers that can only be rebooted after hours, make sure they accommodate that) and any critical devices that might need special handling. That said, any professional MSP will work with you on these requirements.

For most organizations, especially those without large IT departments, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks. An outsourced patch service means peace of mind: you know your systems are being looked after by pros. As one report summarized, you gain specialized expertise, scalability, faster deployments, and predictable costs by using managed services[26][27]. You’re essentially partnering with experts who have a strong incentive to prevent problems rather than just react to them[28]. After all, an MSP succeeds when your network runs smoothly with minimal incidents.

To give a concrete example, Pinpoint Tech’s managed IT services bundle includes automated patch management as a core feature – “we handle updates, patches, and licensing so your team can keep working without interruption”[29]. Our team uses monitoring tools to catch new patches, applies them in coordinated maintenance windows, and double-checks that everything is protected. This kind of service can be a game-changer for a small IT team or any organization without dedicated patching staff – whether you’re running a shop in Liberty, a clinic in Moberly, or a city office in St. Joseph, an MSP can shoulder the update burden for you. Instead of spending your evenings installing updates or worrying you missed something, you can rest easy knowing it’s handled. And if a rare issue arises (say a patch causes a software conflict), a managed service will troubleshoot and resolve it for you.

Free vs. Managed: Which Should You Choose?

Both approaches have their merits, and the right choice depends on your business’s resources, complexity, and priorities. Here’s a quick comparison to help guide your decision:

• Upfront Cost: Free tools have no licensing fee – great for a lean IT budget. Managed services charge a recurring fee. However, that fee often replaces the cost of either hiring extra IT staff or dealing with fallout from missed patches. Many businesses find the predictable monthly cost of an MSP is worth the peace of mind and actually cost-effective in the long run (especially compared to the potential cost of a breach or major downtime incident)[30]. Think of it as insurance: an investment to prevent far costlier problems.
• Ongoing Effort: With DIY patching, all the effort is on you. Your team must continually manage the tools, monitor for new updates, test and deploy them, and fix any issues. This requires consistent attention week after week. With a managed service, the provider handles the heavy lifting – you and your staff spend close to zero time on patch management, aside from an occasional check-in or reviewing reports. This can translate into dozens of hours saved per month, which your team can redirect to serving customers or improving the business.
• Expertise & Quality: Free solutions rely on your in-house expertise. If you have a skilled system administrator who knows scripting and patch policies well, you can achieve good results. But if not, you may hit steep learning curves or risk doing something incorrectly. With an MSP, you are tapping into experienced professionals who specialize in IT maintenance. They bring knowledge of best practices (e.g. which patches to prioritize, how to roll out updates with minimal disruption, how to verify patch success). Importantly, they also provide support – if a patch fails or causes an issue, they will fix it. With DIY, if a critical update fails at 2 AM, it’s on your team to scramble and address it.
• Coverage & Features: Free tools might cover only part of your environment. For instance, one tool might handle Windows updates but not third-party apps, or cover desktops but not network gear. You may need a patchwork of solutions to cover everything. Managed services typically offer complete coverage across your IT estate – from operating systems to common applications – often using unified platforms that also provide rich features like dashboards, reporting, and alerts. You’ll get capabilities (like compliance reports, detailed inventories of missing patches, etc.) that usually aren’t available in most free tools[14].
• Control: Some organizations prefer the DIY route because they want full control over timing and specifics of patching. Free tools let you tweak and customize to your heart’s content. When you outsource, you do give up a bit of direct control (though a good MSP will work closely with you and follow your requirements). For most small businesses, having an expert partner manage patches is a relief, not a loss. But if you absolutely need hands-on control over every patch, you might lean toward an in-house approach (albeit possibly at the cost of more work and risk).
• Risk and Accountability: Using free tools, the responsibility for any security incident from missing patches lies squarely with your organization. If something gets missed, there’s no one to blame but ourselves. With a managed service, you have a partner accountable for this aspect of your security. They will usually have SLAs (service level agreements) promising patch timelines (for example, critical security patches will be applied within X days). Knowing that someone has eyes on this 24/7 greatly reduces the risk that a critical update slips through. That said, it’s wise to ensure any contract specifies how quickly they deploy urgent patches, so expectations are clear.

So, which is right for you? If you’re a small business or local government office with limited IT staff, leaning on a managed service is often the smarter choice to ensure nothing falls through the cracks. The enhanced security, support, and time saved make it a high-value proposition. As one report put it, the ROI on outsourcing patch management is high, given how expensive security professionals and breaches can be[30]. On the other hand, if you’re an IT hobbyist or have a capable IT team with available time, and your environment isn’t too large or regulated, you might successfully run with free tools, at least for a while. Just remember that as you grow – add more employees, more devices, perhaps open new offices – the DIY approach may become harder to scale and keep consistent.

Many businesses start with the DIY method and then transition to a managed service once they hit a certain size or after a close call (like a missed patch causing a virus outbreak). There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but you should weigh the true costs and risks. Ask yourself: Do we have the expertise and hours to handle this in-house indefinitely? If the honest answer is “not really,” it’s probably time to at least explore managed patch management options.

Finally, consider what’s at stake. Cyber threats continue to rise, and even a single unpatched vulnerability can lead to a devastating breach or ransomware attack. Patching is a foundational defense. Whether you achieve it with free tools or a paid service, the goal is the same: keep your systems updated, secure, and running smoothly. Choose the approach that best ensures that outcome for your organization.

Bottom line: Automating patch management is one of the best things you can do for your IT security and reliability. Free tools can work if you have the skill and dedication in-house; managed services provide a “hands-off” solution with expert oversight. If you’re feeling unsure or overwhelmed about patching, it may be worth reaching out for professional help. Pinpoint Tech, for instance, offers patch management as part of our friendly Managed IT packages – taking the burden off your shoulders. We’re proud to help businesses and public institutions across north-central Missouri stay up to date, from Trenton, Brookfield, and Cameron to Kirksville, St. Joseph, and the Kansas City area. The end result is the same: critical updates get applied, cyber threats are kept at bay, and you can focus on your core mission instead of worrying about the next patch Tuesday.

FAQs

Patch management is the process of applying updates (patches) to software – including operating systems, applications, firmware, etc. – in order to fix known vulnerabilities, bugs, and stability issues. It’s important because patches often close security holes that hackers can exploit. Keeping systems patched reduces the risk of malware infections, data breaches, and system failures. For example, when Microsoft releases a security patch for Windows, it’s usually to fix a weakness that attackers might use to gain unauthorized access. If you don’t apply that patch, your PC remains a target for that exploit. Beyond security, patches can improve performance and reliability of software, and ensure you stay compliant with any industry regulations (since many standards require up-to-date software for security). In short, patch management is a key part of good IT hygiene and cyber defense – it’s like regularly locking the doors and windows to your house so intruders can’t easily sneak in.

Automated patch management uses software tools to handle the patch process with minimal human intervention. Typically, it works like this: a patch management tool or service will scan your computers and servers to see which patches are missing or applicable. It keeps an inventory of the software and versions you’re running. When new patches are released (say, a new critical update from Microsoft or Adobe), the system either automatically downloads them or notifies the administrator. The admin can set policies about which patches to auto-approve (for example, apply all critical security patches immediately) and which to maybe hold for testing. The tool will then deploy those patches to all target machines – often scheduling the installation at specific times (like evenings or weekends) to avoid disrupting users during work hours[20]. It can push patches to many machines at once, rather than you having to touch each machine. After deployment, a good automated system will verify success – checking that the patch actually installed on each device and reporting any failures. Many tools also automate reboots if required (or notify users to reboot). In essence, automated patch management removes a lot of the manual drudgery: the system is continually watching for needed updates and taking care of installing them in an organized way. This ensures you stay up-to-date across the board without someone manually downloading and clicking installers on each PC. It’s faster, more consistent, and scales easily to however many devices you have.

There are a number of free or open-source solutions out there, each with its focus. For Windows environments, Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) is a popular free choice for managing Microsoft product updates in a centralized way. To extend WSUS for other software, Local Update Publisher is an open-source tool that lets you deploy third-party app patches via WSUS. Another example is PDQ Deploy – it offers a free version that can automate updates for many common applications (with a library of pre-made update packages)[15]. For Linux systems, you might use native package managers with cron scripts, or something like Ansible (open-source) to script updates across many servers. There’s also ManageEngine’s Patch Manager Plus which has a free tier for small setups, and Action1 is a cloud patching platform that has a free version for up to a certain number of endpoints. Additionally, some admins simply use scripting and tools like Chocolatey (for Windows software installs/updates) to semi-automate patching at no cost aside from your time. Each of these tools comes with a learning curve: you’ll need to configure them and understand their limitations. Also, keep in mind the free versions of commercial tools often have feature or scope limitations (for instance, PDQ’s free mode lacks scheduling and reporting). But if you have more time than budget, these free patch management solutions can definitely help you get a basic patch process in place without purchasing a license.

The benefits largely come down to saving time, improving security, and leveraging expertise. With a managed patch management service (usually provided by an MSP), you get:

• Less work for your team: You and your staff no longer have to monitor, download, and apply patches – the service handles all that, freeing up your time for other tasks.
• Expert oversight: Dedicated IT professionals (at the provider) are handling your updates. They bring experience and follow best practices, which means patches are more likely to be applied correctly and promptly than in a busy DIY scenario[8]. They also can often spot issues (like a patch that fails or causes a conflict) and resolve them quickly, whereas you might struggle to even notice that on your own.
• Faster patching of critical fixes: A managed service will prioritize urgent security patches and often deploy them faster than an overextended in-house team could. This reduces the window of exposure when new threats emerge. It also means you get the benefit of new software improvements sooner.
• Comprehensive coverage: An MSP will typically ensure all your devices and many software applications are patched. They often have tools that handle Microsoft, Apple, and third-party apps in one system. So you won’t have the common gaps that DIY setups sometimes have (e.g., forgetting to update an uncommon application or an offsite laptop).
• Reporting and compliance: You’ll receive reports showing the patch status of your systems, which is great for peace of mind and for any compliance audits. If you need to show auditors or management that you’re up to date on patches, the MSP can provide documentation.
• Predictable cost and potentially lower risk: Instead of the variable costs of handling things ad-hoc (or the potential huge cost of a breach due to an unpatched system), you pay a steady fee and significantly reduce the risk of security incidents. In many cases, businesses find that outsourcing patches actually saves money when you factor in the value of time saved and incidents avoided. [26][19]

In short, using a managed service means patches happen on time, with minimal hassle, and you gain a partner who is accountable for that portion of your IT. The flip side, of course, is you have to trust a third party and there is a direct cost – but for a lot of small and mid-sized organizations, those are well worth the trade-off given the critical importance of keeping systems secure.

The cost of a managed patch service can vary based on the provider and the size of your environment, but it’s generally designed to be affordable for small and mid-sized businesses. Typically, patch management is either included in a broader managed IT services package or offered at a per-device or per-month rate. To give a rough idea, some sources indicate that patch management as a service might range around $50–$100 per month for a small office (depending on number of devices) – which would be a few hundred to a thousand dollars per year[31]. Prices can be higher or lower, though, depending on what’s included. For instance, if the service also includes full endpoint management or other extras, it might cost more. If you have only a handful of devices, some providers have very entry-level pricing or even include it free in an overall package. The key is that this expense is predictable (usually a flat monthly fee), which makes budgeting easier.

Importantly, consider the value side of the equation. By outsourcing patch management, you’re potentially avoiding much bigger costs. A single cybersecurity incident can cost tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in recovery, downtime, and reputational damage. Even a full-time junior IT employee’s salary will far exceed what an MSP charges to handle patching. In that context, managed patch services tend to deliver a high ROI[30]. They reduce your risk of breach and free up your staff’s time (which is money). So, while you do pay for the service, it often saves money when you factor in productivity and risk reduction. Many small business owners ultimately find managed services “worth it” because it turns a tricky, technical chore into a turnkey service. When evaluating cost, you should get quotes from a couple of providers – look at what’s included and how they charge (per device, per user, or flat fee). But don’t just think in terms of expense – think of it as an investment in protecting your business. As the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Relying on built-in updaters (like Windows Update, or an app’s auto-update feature) is definitely better than nothing, but it’s not a complete patch management strategy for a business. Here’s why: First, not all software auto-updates. Many business applications, drivers, firmware, and smaller vendors’ tools require manual updates or an external patch system. If you only rely on each program to update itself, some will inevitably fall through the cracks (because they simply don’t have that capability or it’s disabled). Second, even when software can auto-update, those features might be turned off or delayed. For example, Windows Update might be paused by a user, or set to a schedule that leaves a critical patch not applied for weeks. Users often click “Remind me later” – meaning an important update gets postponed indefinitely. Third, with auto-updaters you lack centralized control and visibility. You don’t get a dashboard telling you “these 5 PCs failed to apply last night’s updates.” A patch management system or service gives you that single pane of glass to see everything. Auto-updates also typically happen on the software’s schedule, which might reboot a computer at an inconvenient time, etc., unless the user intervenes. With a managed approach, you can coordinate timing to avoid disrupting work. Finally, certain updates (like major version upgrades) might not be covered by auto-updaters, or they might require config changes that an MSP/tool would handle but an automatic updater would not. In summary, auto-updaters are a helpful feature (and we encourage keeping them enabled when appropriate), but they don’t eliminate the need for oversight. For a home user, letting Windows and Chrome update themselves is usually fine. But in a business setting with dozens of applications and computers, you want a proactive patch management plan to ensure every software component is up to date and to know about it when they are not. Think of auto-update features as just one piece of the puzzle – a good patch management process or service ties all those pieces together and fills in the gaps.

Sources

1. Heimdal Security – Free/Open-Source Patch Management Tools (2025): Heimdal Security blog article “8+ Free and Open Source Patch Management Tools for Your Company” (updated July 29, 2025), which includes statistics from Edgescan’s 2024 Vulnerability Report (e.g. average 65 days to remediate critical flaws, 33% of 2022 vulnerabilities were high/critical) and details on tools like PDQ Deploy and Local Update Publisher[1][32].
2. Indusface – Key Cybersecurity Statistics 2025: “192 Cybersecurity Statistics for 2025” (Indusface Blog, 2025) – Provides recent data on vulnerabilities and breaches, including that 20% of breaches in 2024 started with vulnerability exploitation and a Ponemon Institute finding that 60% of breaches are linked to unpatched vulnerabilities[4][33].
3. eSecurity Planet – Patch Management as a Service (2025): “What Is Patch Management as a Service & Is It Worth It?” by eSecurity Planet (Jan 2025). Discusses the challenges of manual patching (time-consuming, error-prone) and benefits of outsourcing. Notable quotes from experts at ServiceNow and Flexera about manual patching pulling IT staff from core duties and PMaaS being relatively inexpensive with a high ROI[8][34].
4. Heimdal Security – Patch Management as a Service Guide (2025): Heimdal’s article “What Is Patch Management as a Service (PMaaS) & What Can It Do For You?” (updated Aug 14, 2025). Outlines advantages of managed patch services vs. regular patching – including expertise, scalability, security, and predictable cost – and notes that many organizations delay patches for months, with manual patching leading to human error[26][3].
5. SecOps Solution – Open Source vs. Commercial Tools (2024): SecOps® Solution blog post “Evaluating Open Source vs. Commercial Patch Management Tools” (May 2, 2024). Details the pros and cons of open-source patch tools (cost-effective, flexible, but limited support and integration challenges) vs. paid solutions (dedicated support, advanced features, but with licensing costs)[12][35].
6. Heimdal Security – Free Patch Tools Pros/Cons (2025): Same Heimdal blog in source #1, which also provides specific pros and cons for tools. For example, Local Update Publisher’s integration with WSUS is free but “requires knowledge of WSUS” and lacks advanced reporting/automation, limited to Windows[14]. PDQ Deploy’s free version pros and cons are also noted (user-friendly, Active Directory integration, but no vulnerability scanning and not ideal for large scale without paid version)[36][37].
7. Pinpoint Tech – Managed IT Services (2023): Pinpoint Tech’s own website (Service page for Small & Mid-Sized Businesses, 2023) which emphasizes that their managed IT plans “handle updates, patches, and licensing so your team can keep working without interruption.” This reflects the hands-off benefits of letting an MSP manage patching[29].
8. Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report 2024: (Referenced via Indusface and Pinpoint Tech content) Statistical report indicating the prevalence of vulnerability exploitation in breaches. In 2024’s DBIR, for instance, ~20% of breaches were traced to known vulnerabilities being exploited[4].
9. Ponemon Institute – 2019 Study on Patch Delays: (Referenced via Indusface) Found that “60% of breach victims said they were compromised via an unpatched known vulnerability.” This oft-cited stat underlines the critical importance of timely patching[2].
10. Microsoft & Industry Patch Guidance: (General knowledge/implied) Microsoft’s documentation on WSUS and Windows Update, and industry best practices for patch management (scheduling, third-party updates, etc.), which inform the guidance that relying solely on auto-updates is not sufficient for business needs. (No specific document cited, but basis for the Windows Update FAQ answer and general recommendations.)

[1] [9] [10] [11] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [21] [32] [36] [37] 8+ Free and Open Source Patch Management Tools for Your Company [Updated 2025]

https://heimdalsecurity.com/blog/free-open-source-patch-management-tools/

[2] [4] [5] [33] 192 Cybersecurity Statistics for 2025 | Indusface Blog

https://www.indusface.com/blog/key-cybersecurity-statistics/

[3] [26] [27] What Is Patch Management as a Service (PMaaS)

https://heimdalsecurity.com/blog/patch-management-as-a-service/

[6] [7] [8] [19] [20] [22] [23] [24] [25] [30] [31] [34] What Is Patch Management as a Service & Is It Worth It?

https://www.esecurityplanet.com/applications/patch-management-as-a-service/

[12] [13] [35] Evaluating Open Source vs. Commercial Patch Management Tools | SecOps® Solution

https://www.secopsolution.com/blog/open-source-vs-commercial-patch-management-tools

[28] Top 7 Tech Headaches We Fix for Small Businesses Weekly

https://pinpointtech.pro/blog/top-7-tech-headaches-small-business/

[29] IT Support for Small & Mid-Sized Businesses | Pinpoint Tech

https://pinpointtech.pro/services/businesses-it-support/